Download Regional Missile Defense from a Global Perspective by Catherine McArdle Kelleher, Peter Dombrowski PDF

By Catherine McArdle Kelleher, Peter Dombrowski

Regional Missile safeguard from a world Perspective explains the origins, evolution, and implications of the neighborhood method of missile protection that has emerged because the presidency of George H. W. Bush, and has culminated with the missile safety judgements of President Barack Obama. The Obama administration's overarching thought for American missile safety specializes in constructing either a countrywide approach of constrained ground-based defenses, situated in Alaska and California, meant to counter restricted intercontinental threats, and regionally-based missile defenses which include cellular ground-based applied sciences just like the Patriot PAC-3 method, and sea-based Aegis-equipped destroyer and cruisers.

The quantity is meant to stimulate renewed debates in strategic reviews and public coverage circles over the contribution of nearby and nationwide missile safeguard to international protection. Written from quite a number views by way of practitioners and lecturers, the e-book offers a wealthy resource for realizing the applied sciences, background, international relations, and strategic implications of the slow evolution of yank missile safeguard plans. specialists and non-experts alike—whether wanting to envision the offense-defense tradeoffs anew, to have interaction with a coverage replace, or to raised comprehend the controversy because it pertains to a rustic or region—will locate this e-book valuable. whereas it opens the door to the debates, even if, it doesn't locate or supply effortless solutions—because they don't exist.



Show description

Read or Download Regional Missile Defense from a Global Perspective PDF

Similar military sciences books

Counterdeception Principles and Applications for National Security

This day, greater than ever, using denial and deception (D&D) is getting used to atone for an opponent's army superiority, to acquire or advance guns of mass destruction, and to violate overseas agreements and sanctions. even supposing the ancient literature at the use of strategic deception is extensively on hand, technical assurance of the topic is scattered in hard-to-find and out-of-print assets.

Jadgwaffe: The War in Russia January - October 1942

Carrying on with this quantity focussing on operations at the japanese entrance, the clash in Russian territory is chronicled within the 3rd a part of this finished survey of colors and markings used throughout the crusade.

Britain, NATO and Nuclear Weapons: Alternative Defence Versus Alliance Reform

An exam of nuclear palms keep watch over and defence containing papers that current opposing facets of the talk. Nuclear deterrence, Britain's defence funds, the nation of Anglo-American family members, NATO techniques and Mr Gorbachev's safeguard preparations in Europe proposals are mentioned.

Civil War Artillery at Gettysburg

Civil conflict Artillery at Gettysburg

Extra info for Regional Missile Defense from a Global Perspective

Example text

Subsequent deployment phases were not defined. Press reports said that Phase I would be designed to intercept about one-third of a 5,000-warhead Soviet attack. In a further effort to scale back SDI, Senator Sam Nunn in January 1988 proposed an Accidental Launch Protection System (ALPS) to defend against accidental or unauthorized Soviet launches, while calling for research on advanced technologies that might provide a nationwide defense in the longer term. The Defense Science Board (DSB), a Pentagon advisory committee, endorsed ALPS as the first step in a six-step Phase I deployment process.

9 In September 1992, the United States proposed amendments to the ABM Treaty that would permit several hundred GBIs and lift restrictions on sensors. The United States argued that sensors should “run free” because of their importance for multiple functions beyond missile defense. The United States did not call for immediate amendments to allow Space-Based Interceptors—an important further departure from the original SDI vision. S. missile defense policy, symbolized in the renaming of the SDIO to the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO).

Bush administration defined a limited attack as “a few hundred warheads,”12 requiring the deployment of many hundreds of interceptors. By contrast, George W. Bush, who was in many ways more of an advocate for missile defenses than his father, ended up authorizing the deployment of just fifty-four interceptors for homeland defense (including ten based in Europe). MOVING FORWARD OR STAYING BACK? In spite of the broad consensus, policy goals have not remained entirely constant. In particular, the relative emphasis that successive administrations have placed on homeland versus forward defense has shifted metronomically since the end of the Cold War, with Republican presidents emphasizing homeland defense and Democratic presidents emphasizing forward defense.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.83 of 5 – based on 42 votes