By Paul K. Davis, Stuart E. Johnson, Duncan Long, kavid C. Gompert
A debate will most probably happen in 2009 approximately U.S. worldwide national-security technique. The authors describe and illustrate a strategy to aid body and review resource-informed ideas. The middle is an built-in portfolio-analysis strategy that compares strategies through their expected effectiveness, dangers, and source implications, 3 illustrative grand suggestions are in comparison, which deal in several methods with the issues of our time.
Read or Download Developing Resource-Informed Strategic Assessments and Recommendations PDF
Best military sciences books
This present day, greater than ever, using denial and deception (D&D) is getting used to atone for an opponent's army superiority, to procure or increase guns of mass destruction, and to violate overseas agreements and sanctions. even supposing the historic literature at the use of strategic deception is broadly on hand, technical insurance of the topic is scattered in hard-to-find and out-of-print assets.
Carrying on with this quantity focussing on operations at the japanese entrance, the clash in Russian territory is chronicled within the 3rd a part of this accomplished survey of colors and markings used in the course of the crusade.
An exam of nuclear fingers regulate and defence containing papers that current opposing aspects of the controversy. Nuclear deterrence, Britain's defence funds, the kingdom of Anglo-American family, NATO suggestions and Mr Gorbachev's safeguard preparations in Europe proposals are mentioned.
Civil conflict Artillery at Gettysburg
- US Strategy in Africa: AFRICOM, Terrorism and Security Challenges
- History of Operations Research in the United States Army, V. 3, 1973-1995
- Maritime Defence
- The Evolving Terrorist Threat to Southeast Asia: A Net Assessment
- Women and the Military in Europe: Comparing Public Cultures
Additional info for Developing Resource-Informed Strategic Assessments and Recommendations
However, it would be for an analytical group to assure that results were scaled in a way commensurate with the more quantitative measures used in the portfolio analysis. An attractive feature of this analytic approach is that it lends itself well to either deliberate analysis over many months or rapid-paced analysis. 9). Assuming expertise (the result of prior analysis and experience), structure, ruthless objectivity, and candor, such work might be better, not merely faster, than would be possible in a deliberate process with committees, logrolling, and the potential for missing the point by sticking too exclusively to on-the-shelf detailed work.
That is, the monograph is about decision support for top-level military and civilian leaders. This might suggest that our approach would be fully “top-down” in character. S. objectives and strategy and the central role of the military commands on which the burden for action must fall. Assessments of alternative military strategies, moreover, must reﬂect a level of analysis that may seem “bottom-up” to national authorities, even if it is seen as strategic and top-down by the individual commands.
For example, in the realm of personal ﬁnance, an individual’s investment portfolio may include stocks, bonds, real estate, and money-market funds. Such variety is customary because individuals have multiple objectives such as long-term capital gain, current income, and—important—protection against the risks posed by normal ﬁnancial-market ﬂuctuations. Managing risk has been a traditional core element of portfolio work. Our portfolio approach stems from the following principles: 1. Integration. We wish to be able to assess a strategy simultaneously for its likely eﬀectiveness, risks, upside potential (not discussed in this monograph), and resource implications.